<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>PLY INSIGHT</provider_name><provider_url>https://plyinsight.com/hi</provider_url><author_name>Ply Insight</author_name><author_url>https://plyinsight.com/hi/author/qwer123/</author_url><title>&#xA0;Reconsideration of inverted duty structure - PLY INSIGHT</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="ATuKcEhRly"&gt;&lt;a href="https://plyinsight.com/hi/reconsideration-of-inverted-duty-structure/"&gt;&#xA0;Reconsideration of inverted duty structure&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://plyinsight.com/hi/reconsideration-of-inverted-duty-structure/embed/#?secret=ATuKcEhRly" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;&#xA0;Reconsideration of inverted duty structure&#x201D; &#x2014; PLY INSIGHT" data-secret="ATuKcEhRly" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script type="text/javascript"&gt;
/* &lt;![CDATA[ */
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
//# sourceURL=https://plyinsight.com/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js
/* ]]&gt; */
&lt;/script&gt;</html><thumbnail_url>https://plyinsight.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/756580-gst-112118.jpg</thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width>1280</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height>720</thumbnail_height><description>An empowered group of ministers (GoM) &#x2013; set up to look into rate rationalisation &#x2013; may propose pruning Goods and Services Tax (GST) exemptions on certain goods and services and correcting the inverted duty structure during the next GST Council meeting. The ministerial panel, which is likely to meet ahead of the Council meeting, may [&hellip;]</description></oembed>
